By Rudy Barnes, Jr.
Not
since the Civil War has America been so divided. It has become balkanized by race and
religion, as evidenced in our partisan gridlock, gerrymandered congressional
districts, and divergent doctrines of Christianity. To avoid further polarization we need to
promote a politics of reconciliation that can provide functional pluralism for
an increasingly diverse population.
Where
to begin? Over 70% of Americans claim to
be Christians, so that a politics of reconciliation should begin in the
church. The first step is for Christians
to acknowledge that the altruistic moral teachings of Jesus should be applied
to their politics. Otherwise their
Christian religion is as spiritually dead as a body without the spirit. (see
James 2:26)
Every
Christian in America has the moral duty to be a steward of our democracy. That requires applying the moral imperatives
taught by Jesus in our democratic processes, especially in electing our
leaders. When Christians ignore their
duties of discipleship in politics, they not only undermine U.S. democracy, but
also the moral legitimacy of the Christian religion.
Black
Christians and evangelical Christians have long related their religion to their
politics, but mainline white denominations have avoided mixing religion and
politics. Even so, partisan politics
have become defined by race, and gerrymandered voting districts have
institutionalized partisan politics along racial lines, resulting in dangerous
political polarization.
The
greatest commandment to love God and to love our neighbors as we love
ourselves is a common word of faith
that can break the religious and political gridlock. When Jesus was asked, Who is my neighbor? he answered with the story of a good Samaritan who stopped to help a wounded Jew.
(Luke 10:25-37) That was a radical
message for Jews who detested Samaritans as apostates.
With
partisan politics polarized along racial lines and more political animosity
than ever, Christians need to be reminded that loving their neighbors of other
races, religions and even those they detest is a moral imperative of their
faith. Christians who exempt politics
from their faith are hypocrites—and while Jesus taught love for others, he
condemned hypocrites.
Christians
need to make their faith relevant to their politics with the stewardship of
democracy. They should consider the
values of candidates and political issues without making political
endorsements. In the past churches have
considered issues of slavery, temperance, civil rights—even the lottery. Today they are facing contentious issues of
sexual preference that are polarizing religion and politics, but regrettably
these issues are not being discussed in church.
In
promoting a politics of reconciliation, there will always be contentious
issues. That’s the nature of a
pluralistic democracy. Christians need
to learn to disagree agreeably as they discuss how to relate their Christian
values to candidates and political issues such as tax reform, health care,
immigration and foreign policy; and prior to elections they should invite
candidates to church hall meetings, where a church venue should promote more
enlightened political views.
The
church offers a big tent for all legitimate political preferences, from
libertarian politics that emphasize individual rights to socialistic politics
that emphasize the common good, but populist demagoguery must be opposed. Unfortunately, white South Carolina
Christians have supported populist demagogues from “Pitchfork” Ben Tillman to
Donald Trump.
The
greatest challenge for democracy today is to balance individual rights with providing
for the common good; but achieving that balance will be difficult with America
polarized by a two-party duopoly that is split along racial lines. A moral revival is needed to promote a
politics of reconciliation, and that revival should begin in the church. Its purpose should not be to promote
political unity, but to make Christians better stewards of their pluralistic
democracy.
Notes:
Michael Gerson has lamented the
deplorable state of morality in politics, “With two very sick political parties
that have a monopoly on political power and little prospect for reform and
recovery.” Gerson has pessimistically
predicted that our two political parties
cannot save themselves (and us) from a political earthquake that will make
America’s future “uncertain, maybe unknowable.”
See https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/our-political-parties-cant-save-themselves/2017/11/06/0304c3f8-c321-11e7-84bc-5e285c7f4512_story.html?undefined=&wpisrc=nl_headlines&wpmm=1.
David Brooks has noted that 2017 is
the centennial of the Bolshevik Revolution, when Lenin and Trotsky took over
Russia with a new authoritarian moral order under communism. That was possible because Russian democrats
and the Russian Orthodox Church failed to assert their moral authority. A similar moral default may be undermining
democracy in the U.S. today. See https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/26/opinion/the-week-trump-won.html.
David Bentley Hart has asked, Are Christians supposed to be Communists?
based on a teaching of Jesus in Luke 14:33 that requires giving up everything
as a condition of discipleship. See https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/04/opinion/sunday/christianity-communism.html.
Mitchell T. Rozanski has opined that
reconciliation among Christians may be
closer than we think. He promotes a
Christian unity, or reconciliation, among Christian denominations that respects
diversity but eliminates acrimony over religious and political
differences. See
On how the prosperity gospel explains Donald Trump’s popularity with
Christian voters, see https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/07/15/how-the-prosperity-gospel-explains-donald-trumps-popularity-with-christian-voters/?wpisrc=nl_headlines&wpmm=1.
On President Trump praising Robert
Jeffress as a wonderful pastor who says
Satan founded the Catholic Church, see
https://www.thedailybeast.com/president-trump-promotes-book-by-wonderful-pastor-who-says-satan-founded-the-catholic-church.
Related
Commentary:
(1/11/15): The Greatest Commandment: A Common Word of Faith
(6/18/16): A Politics of Reconciliation with Liberty and Justice for All
(6/28/15): Confronting the Evil Among Us
(7/5/15): Reconciliation as a Remedy for Racism and Religious Exclusivism
(8/2/15): Freedom and Fundamentalism
http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2015/08/freedom-and-fundamentalism.html (8/9/15): Balancing
Individual Rights with Collective Responsibilities
(1/23/16): Who Is My Neighbor?
(1/30/16): The Politics of Loving Our Neighbors as Ourselves
(2/18/17): Gerrymandering, Race and Polarized Partisan Politics
(2/27/16): Conflicting Concepts of Legitimacy in Faith, Freedom and Politics
(4/23/16): Standards of Legitimacy in Morality, Manners and Political Correctness
(4/30/16): The Relevance of Religion to Politics
(5/7/16): Religion and a Politics of Reconciliation
(8/5/16): How Religion Can Bridge Our Political and Cultural Divide
(9/17/16): A Moral Revival to Restore Legitimacy to Our Politics
(11/19/16): Religion and a Politics of Reconciliation Based on Shared Values
http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2016/11/religion-and-politics-of-reconciliation_19.html
(11/26/16): Irreconcilable Differences and the Demise of Democracy
(2/25/17): The Need for a Revolution in Religion and Politics
(3/18/17): Moral Ambiguity in Religion and Politics
(4/22/17): The Relevance of Jesus and the Irrelevance of the Church in Today’s
World
(7/1/17): Religion, Moral Authority and Conflicting Concepts of Legitimacy
(7/15/17) Religion and Progressive Politics
(8/19/17) Hate,
History and the Need for a Politics of Reconciliation
(9/23/17): Tribalism and the American Civil Religion
(9/30/17): The 500th Anniversary of the Protestant Reformation: What
Does It Mean Today? http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2017/09/the-500th-anniversary-of-protestant.html.
(10/7/17): A 21st Century Reformation to Restore Reason to American
Civil Religion http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2017/10/a-21st-century-reformation-to-restore.html.
(10/28/17): The Moral Decline of Religion and the Seven Woes of Jesus
(11/4/17): What to Believe? Truth or Consequences in Religion and Politics http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2017/11/what-to-believe-truth-or-consequences.html.
No comments:
Post a Comment